/en/trial_results en Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:08:21 +0900 Rhymix /en/trial_results/62493 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Watermelon Yield Evaluation of Hi-Cote Fertilizer in Vietnam</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <ul style="font-size:20px;"> <li><strong>Experiment design:</strong> Dr. Kwon Oh Yeon, Chief Research Officer at Nousbo, Ph.D.</li> <li><strong>Organization of the performance:</strong>&nbsp;National Center For Fertilizer Testing, Hanoi, Vietnam</li> <li><strong>Address:</strong>&nbsp;No. 65 Sa Doi Street, Phu Do Ward, Nam Tu Liem District, Hanoi</li> <li><strong>Field location:</strong> Binh Xuyen Hi-tech Agriculture and Forestry Co., Ltd., Xuan Quang, Gia Khanh town, Binh Xuyen district, Vinh Phuc province</li> <li><strong>Demonstration crop variety:</strong> Watermelon Black Beauty Super 389</li> <li><strong>Date of experiment:&nbsp;</strong> March 2024 &ndash; June 2024</li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Currently, watermelons cover approximately 3.5 million hectares worldwide, with major production areas in countries like China, Turkey, Iran, and Vietnam. In Vietnam, watermelons are a crucial crop, especially in the Mekong Delta region, contributing significantly to the local economy. Among the key fertilizer elements, nitrogen (N) is particularly essential. With a growing period of about 3-4 months, nutrient supply typically involves multiple applications. However, the residual effect of chemical fertilizers lasts only about 30 to 40 days, posing a risk of reduced growth due to inadequate nitrogen content. Therefore, the application of Controlled Release Fertilizers (CRF) is necessary to supply all required nutrients throughout the entire plant growth period.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The Hi-Cote Controlled Release Fertilizer (CRF) [23-6-12] was tested in Vietnam to evaluate its effect on watermelon yield and compare its performance to conventional fertilizers. The test lasted from March 28 to June 10, 2024. Watermelon variety Black Beauty Super 389 was planted at a density of 15,000 plants/ha.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Fertilization process.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/61752/493/062/9dfc32c5fe36468283b043704fce5bc9.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">Fertilization process</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Three treatments were tested:</span></p> <ul> <li><span style="font-size:16px;">CT1: Control with no fertilizer applied</span></li> <li><span style="font-size:16px;">CT2: Local farming methods (&ldquo;G&rdquo; organic-mineral fertilizer): 2,500 kg/ha</span></li> <li><span style="font-size:16px;">CT3: Hi-Cote Controlled Release Fertilizer: 225 kg/ha (N: 51.75 kg/ha, P₂O₅: 13.5 kg/ha, K₂O: 27 kg/ha).</span></li> </ul> <p><br /> <span style="font-size:20px;">Fertilizer was applied in the cavity, then covered with a thin layer of soil and plastic film before sowing seeds, with the cavity 60 cm apart.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="table-container"> <table class="tg" style="text-align: center; width: 100%;"> <thead> <tr> <th>Treatment</th> <th>Type of fertilizer</th> <th>Amount of commercial fertilizer (kg/ha)</th> <th>Total content N; P₂O₅; K₂O(kg/ha)</th> <th>The amount of commercial fertilizer (kg/100m²)</th> <th>Fertilization period, amount of application</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>CT1</td> <td colspan="5">Control with no fertilizer applied</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CT2</td> <td>&ldquo;G&rdquo; organic-mineral fertilizer</td> <td>2,500</td> <td>-</td> <td>25</td> <td>Top dressing: Apply 100% of &ldquo;G&rdquo; fertilizer</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CT3</td> <td>Hi-Cote</td> <td>225</td> <td>N: 51.75<br /> P₂O₅ : 13.5<br /> K₂O: 27</td> <td>2.25</td> <td>Top dressing: Apply 100% of Hi-Cote fertilizer (15g per cavity)</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p style="text-align: center;">Fertilizer application methods and rates</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The tests were performed on a small-scale (300m&sup2;) trial and a large-scale (750m&sup2;) trial. The following growth parameters were evaluated: growth and development, crop yield, fruit size, and fruit sweetness.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Fruiting stage.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/61752/493/062/9715456bd12c61be478b1f5546d2213a.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">Fertilization process</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Through the small and large-scale trials, Hi-Cote 23-6-12 fertilizer (application rate 225 kg/ha) in Gia Khanh town, Binh Xuyen district, Vinh Phuc province yielded higher results compared to the local fertilizer. Specifically:</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li><span style="font-size:20px;">Small-scale trial: CRF treated area showed an actual yield of 27,540 kg/ha, 10.29% higher than the local fertilizer formula.</span></li> <li><span style="font-size:20px;">Large-scale trial: Actual yield was 27,188 kg/ha, 12.61% higher than the local fertilizer formula.</span></li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Yielded fruits (CT3 - Hi-Cote CRF treatment, CT2 - Local farming methods with conventional fertiliz.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/61752/493/062/6047e5f87ddd894a4ab2142e066924f2.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">Yielded fruits (CT3 - Hi-Cote CRF treatment ; CT2 - Local farming methods with conventional fertilizer treatment ; CT1 - Control)</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The average fruit diameter, weight, and sweetness were higher in the Hi-Cote treated area compared to the local fertilizer formula:</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li><span style="font-size:20px;">Average fruit diameter: 16.2 cm</span></li> <li><span style="font-size:20px;">Average fruit weight: 3.2 kg</span></li> <li><span style="font-size:20px;">Average sweetness: 14.3 Brix</span></li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p align="center" style="text-align:center">&nbsp;</p> <div class="table-container"> <table class="tg" style="text-align: center; width: 100%;"> <thead> <tr> <th>&nbsp;</th> <th colspan="2">Small-scale trial</th> <th colspan="5">Large-scale trial</th> </tr> <tr> <td>Treatment</td> <td>Productivity (kg/ha)</td> <td>Yield Bumpers vs. CT2 (%)</td> <td>Productivity (kg/ha)</td> <td>Yield Bumpers vs. CT2 (%)</td> <td>Average Fruit Diameter (cm)</td> <td>Average fruit weight (kg)</td> <td>Average Fruit Sweetness (in Brix)</td> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>CT1</td> <td>18,350</td> <td>-</td> <td>19,028</td> <td>-</td> <td>12.4</td> <td>1.7</td> <td>10.1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CT2</td> <td>24,970</td> <td>-</td> <td>24,144</td> <td>-</td> <td>15.1</td> <td>2.9</td> <td>12.8</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CT3</td> <td>27,540</td> <td>10.29</td> <td>27,188</td> <td>12.61</td> <td>16.2</td> <td>3.2</td> <td>14.3</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p style="text-align: center;">Yield and growth parameters of Watermelon affected by various treatments in Vietnam</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The results of the small and large-scale demonstrations showed that Hi-Cote 23-6-12 fertilizer increased actual yield by 10% compared to the local fertilizer, with improved average fruit diameter, weight, and sweetness. Additionally, the color and flesh quality of the fruits were superior. Thus, Hi-Cote fertilizer is highly effective for watermelon cultivation and agricultural production in general. To enhance yield, fruit size, sweetness, and color of watermelons, it is recommended to use Hi-Cote 23-6-12 fertilizer in watermelon production.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://hi-cote.com/" target="_blank"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://hi-cote.com/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <style type="text/css">.tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:12px 12px;word-break:normal; border-color:#c0c0c0;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:12px 12px;word-break:normal;background-color:#efefef;border-color:#c0c0c0;color:#000000;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle} </style> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/62493 /en/trial_results/62493#comment Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:15:36 +0900 /en/trial_results/62366 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Test Report on Sugarcane Fertilizer in Cambodia</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <ul style="font-size:20px;"> <li><strong>Experiment design:</strong> Kwon Oh Yeon, Nousbo Chief Research Officer, PhD.</li> <li><strong>Field location:</strong> Kampong Seila, Cambodia</li> <li><strong>Variety:</strong> KK3 (Thailand Variety)</li> <li><strong>Date of experiment:</strong> February 2020 &ndash; November 2020.</li> <li><strong>Date of publication:</strong> 2024.05.02.</li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="사탕수수이미지.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/61752/366/062/e63cfb8e8e05e0bf9b3abc121914a54b.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Currently, sugarcane covers approximately 26 million hectares across 128 countries, with an average yield of 54MT/ha, making it a major crop globally. Sugarcane plays a crucial role in biomass and sugar production. Among the key fertilizer elements, nitrogen (N) is particularly essential. With a growth period of one year, nutrient supply typically involves 2-3 applications. However, the residual effect of chemical fertilizers lasts only about 30 to 40 days, posing a risk of reduced growth due to inadequate nitrogen content. Therefore, the application of Controlled Release Fertilizers (CRF) is necessary to supply all required nutrients throughout the entire plant growth period.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer [23-3-5+MgO 2%+SiO2 4%+CaO 6%] contains Sigmoid-type Controlled Release Fertilizer (CRF) and NPS, a functional substance from Nousbo. NPS promotes root development and nutrient absorption, while CRF ensures the gradual release of nutrients for enhanced effectiveness. Additionally, the fertilizer includes essential elements like K and Mg for photosynthesis and Ca and Si to improve plant structure, disease resistance, and photosynthetic efficiency, thereby enhancing crop quality. This fertilizer is applied once as a basal dressing.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="table-container"> <table class="tg" style="text-align: center; width: 100%;"> <thead> <tr> <th>Nutrient(%)</th> <th>(N)<br /> 23%</th> <th>(P2O5)<br /> 3%</th> <th>(K2O)<br /> 5%</th> <th>(MgO)<br /> 2%</th> <th>(CaO)<br /> 6%</th> <th>(SiO2)<br /> 4%</th> <th>Others<br /> NPS/Controlled Release<br /> Fertilizer</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Effect</td> <td>Growth</td> <td>Root</td> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2">Promotion of photosynthesis.</td> <td>Tissue</td> <td>Tissue reinforcement, disease resistance.</td> <td>Promotion of root development</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Function</td> <td>Promotion</td> <td>Germination</td> <td>Reinforcement</td> <td>Improvement in morphology</td> <td>Full fertilizer functionality</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer Composition)</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">A field trial was conducted in Kampong Seila, Cambodia, to evaluate the effectiveness of the One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer. The KK3 variety of sugarcane was planted on February 4th, at a rate of 9 tons per hectare. Three treatments were tested: (1) Control with no fertilizer applied; (2) One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer applied once by mixing 300kg per hectare into the soil as a base fertilizer before planting; (3) Conventional Fertilizer, locally used [16-16-8+13S] fertilizer, applied at a rate of 250kg per hectare as base fertilizer, followed by two top dressings, totaling three applications.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <div class="table-container" style="width: 100%;overflow-x: auto;white-space: nowrap;"> <table class="tg" style="text-align: center; width: 100%;"> <thead> <tr> <th rowspan="4">Treatment</th> <th colspan="11">Product application rate and nitrogen component application rate</th> <th colspan="6">Application rate per component (kg/ha)</th> <th rowspan="4">Fertilizer Applications (Total)</th> </tr> <tr> <th colspan="3">Basal dressing [2/1]</th> <th colspan="3">First top dressing [5/7]</th> <th colspan="3">Second top dressing [8/27]</th> <th colspan="2" rowspan="2">Total product amount</th> <th colspan="2" rowspan="2">(N)</th> <th rowspan="3">(P2O4)</th> <th rowspan="3">(K2O)</th> <th rowspan="3">etc</th> <th rowspan="3">Total Amount of Fertilizer Applied (kg/ha)</th> </tr> <tr> <th rowspan="2">Product application rate (kg/ha)</th> <th colspan="2">N Content</th> <th rowspan="2">Product Application Rate (kg/ha)</th> <th colspan="2">N Content</th> <th rowspan="2">Product Application Rate (kg/ha)</th> <th colspan="2">N Content</th> </tr> <tr> <th>Kg/ha</th> <th>% Difference Compared to Conventional</th> <th>Kg/ha</th> <th>% Compared to Conventional Practice</th> <th>Kg/ha</th> <th>Percentage Compared to Conventional Practice</th> <th>Kg/ha</th> <th>% Compared to Conventional Practice</th> <th>Kg/ha</th> <th>% Compared to Conventional Practice</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>(1) Control</td> <td>0</td> <td>0</td> <td>0%</td> <td>0</td> <td>0</td> <td>0%</td> <td>0</td> <td>0</td> <td>0%</td> <td>0</td> <td>0%</td> <td>0</td> <td>0%</td> <td>0</td> <td>0</td> <td>0</td> <td>0</td> <td>0</td> </tr> <tr> <td>(2) One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer[23-3-5+2Mg+7Ca+5Si]</td> <td>300</td> <td>69</td> <td>173%</td> <td>0</td> <td>0</td> <td>0%</td> <td>0</td> <td>0</td> <td>0%</td> <td>300</td> <td>40%</td> <td>69</td> <td>58%</td> <td>9</td> <td>15</td> <td>42</td> <td>135</td> <td>1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>(3) Conventional Fertilization [16-16-8+13S]</td> <td>250</td> <td>40</td> <td>100%</td> <td>250</td> <td>40</td> <td>100%</td> <td>250</td> <td>40</td> <td>100%</td> <td>750</td> <td>100%</td> <td>120</td> <td>100%</td> <td>120</td> <td>60</td> <td>98</td> <td>398</td> <td>3</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">&nbsp;(Fertilizer application methods and rates&nbsp; </span><span style="color:#e67e22;"><span style="font-size:14px;">* horizontal scroll &rarr;</span></span><span style="font-size:18px;">&nbsp;)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Results showed changes in leaf color during growth by analyzing SPAD values measured for each treatment at 6, 7, 8, and 9 months after planting. One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer exhibited SPAD values ranging from 34.8 to 41.2, with an average of 39.0, indicating approximately 107% of leaf color compared to conventional fertilization, without any nutrient deficiency symptoms. Conventional fertilization showed SPAD values ranging from 27.0 to 43.7, with a decrease in leaf color over time, indicating reduced effectiveness. Control treatment exhibited approximately 96% of leaf color, showing symptoms of nutrient deficiency.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Above-ground yield investigation after approximately 12 months revealed that One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer yielded 103.3 tons per hectare, while conventional fertilization yielded 85.8 tons per hectare, approximately 83% compared to One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer. Control treatment yielded 36.7 tons per hectare, approximately 43% compared to conventional fertilization.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="table-container" style="width: 100%;overflow-x: auto;white-space: nowrap;"> <table class="tg" style="text-align: center; width: 100%;"> <thead> <tr> <th rowspan="3">Treatment</th> <th colspan="2">Frequencyoffertilization</th> <th colspan="2">Applicationamountofproduct</th> <th colspan="6">Leafcoloratdifferenttimes(monthsafterplanting)</th> <th colspan="2">Above-groundweight</th> <th colspan="2">Yieldperhectare</th> </tr> <tr> <th rowspan="2">Frequency</th> <th rowspan="2">%ComparedtoConventionalPractice</th> <th rowspan="2">kg/ha</th> <th rowspan="2">%ComparedtoConventionalPractice</th> <th rowspan="2">08.24<br /> (6months)</th> <th rowspan="2">09.25<br /> (7months)</th> <th rowspan="2">10.27<br /> (8months)</th> <th rowspan="2">11.24<br /> (9months)</th> <th colspan="2">Average</th> <th rowspan="2"><br /> Kg<br /> <br /> /stem</th> <th rowspan="2"><br /> %ComparedtoConventionalPractice</th> <th rowspan="2"><br /> Tone</th> <th rowspan="2"><br /> %ComparedtoConventionalPractice</th> </tr> <tr> <th>SPADvalue</th> <th>%ComparedtoConventionalPractice</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td><br /> (1)Control</td> <td><br /> 0</td> <td><br /> 0%</td> <td><br /> 0</td> <td><br /> 0%</td> <td><br /> 38.2</td> <td><br /> 32.8</td> <td><br /> 39.2</td> <td><br /> 29.0</td> <td><br /> 34.8</td> <td><br /> 96%</td> <td><br /> 14.7</td> <td><br /> 43%</td> <td><br /> 36.7</td> <td><br /> 43%</td> </tr> <tr> <td><br /> (2)One-timeSugarcaneSpecializedFertilizer<br /> <br /> [23-3-5+2Mg+7Ca+5Si]</td> <td><br /> 1</td> <td><br /> 33%</td> <td><br /> 300</td> <td><br /> 40%</td> <td><br /> 39.2</td> <td><br /> 34.8</td> <td><br /> 40.9</td> <td><br /> 41.2</td> <td><br /> 39.0</td> <td><br /> 107%</td> <td><br /> 41.3</td> <td><br /> 120%</td> <td><br /> 103.3</td> <td><br /> 120%</td> </tr> <tr> <td><br /> (3)ConventionalFertilization<br /> <br /> [16-16-8+13S]</td> <td><br /> 3</td> <td><br /> 100%</td> <td><br /> 750</td> <td><br /> 100%</td> <td><br /> 43.7</td> <td><br /> 36.5</td> <td><br /> 38.4</td> <td><br /> 27.0</td> <td><br /> 36.4</td> <td><br /> 100%</td> <td><br /> 34.3</td> <td><br /> 100%</td> <td><br /> 85.8</td> <td><br /> 100%</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield and growth parameters of Sugarcane affected by various kinds of treatments in Cambodia </span><span style="color:#e67e22;"><span style="font-size:14px;">* horizontal scroll &rarr;</span></span><span style="font-size:18px;">)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Rooting of sugarcane was well established in the area fertilized with One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer (Picture 1). Even after 103 days of planting, growth in the fertilized area remained superior.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="One-time Sugarcane Fertilizer.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/61752/366/062/3d11f3aec5578e04cf4da3d88dd5a076.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Based on these results, &quot;One-time Sugarcane Specialized Fertilizer&quot; was considered an &quot;effective fertilizer&quot; that supplies nutrients throughout the entire sugarcane growth period with only one basal dressing fertilization.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.nousbo.com/en/slow_release_fertilizer/2789"><img alt="사탕수수 원타임.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/61752/366/062/cad48c5cd092ec87926051bf255b5c32.png" /></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/slow_release_fertilizer/2789" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <style type="text/css">.tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:12px 12px;word-break:normal; border-color:#c0c0c0;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:12px 12px;word-break:normal;background-color:#efefef;border-color:#c0c0c0;color:#000000;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle} </style> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/62366 /en/trial_results/62366#comment Fri, 03 May 2024 09:45:09 +0900 /en/trial_results/62272 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Rice Growth and Grain Yield Enhanced by Nousbo &ldquo;Silica Bubble Tabs&rdquo; Fertilizer in the Philippines</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <ul style="font-size:20px;"> <li><strong>Experiment design:</strong> Kwon Oh Yeon, Nousbo Chief Research Officer, PhD.</li> <li><strong>Research institute:</strong> CLSU, Science City of Mu&ntilde;oz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines.</li> <li><strong>Project Leader:</strong> Constancia C. Dacumos and Belinda G. Elming.</li> <li><strong>Date of experiment:</strong> June 2016 &ndash; October 2016.</li> <li><strong>Date of publication:</strong> 2023.07.28.</li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Silica Bubble Tabs is a Silicate and Potassium fertilizer that increases crop yield and quality by providing essential silicic acid for crops. This fertilizer is widely used in agriculture to improve crop yield, fortify resistance against diseases and pests, enhance environmental stress tolerance, including drought and cold weather, and elevate overall crop quality. Nousbo Silica Bubble Tabs fertilizer was evaluated for its efficacy for Rice production from June to October, 2016 at Barangay San Agustin, Victoria, Tarlac, the Philippines.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="General view of the Experimental Area.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/61752/272/062/723dbd56bc8c83438c1ec24c27439d4c.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(General view of the Experimental Area)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Silica Bubble Tabs Fertilizer at various rates applied as broadcasting method at 25 and 45 days after transplanting were evaluated on its effect on the growth and yield of rice plants planted on plots fertilized with inorganic fertilizer. Key parameters, including plant height, the number of productive tillers, 1000-grain weight, and yield in tons per hectare, were meticulously analyzed. Here&#39;s a summary of the findings: </span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <table class="tg" style="text-align: center;"> <thead> <tr> <th>Treatments</th> <th>Rate</th> <th>Time of<br /> Application</th> <th>Plant Height(cm)<br /> at harvest</th> <th>Productive Tiller<br /> at Harvest</th> <th>Weight of<br /> 1000 Grains</th> <th>Yield in tons<br /> per Hectare</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>T1- Control</td> <td>-</td> <td>-</td> <td>101.50^e</td> <td>9.50^g</td> <td>27.51^d</td> <td>4.38^g</td> </tr> <tr> <td>T2- Recommended Rate of<br /> Inorganic Fertilizer (RRIF)</td> <td>120-60-60 kg NPK/ha</td> <td>25 DAT</td> <td>116.36^d</td> <td>12.65^f</td> <td>29.99^c</td> <td>6.17^f</td> </tr> <tr> <td>T3-RRIF + 0.5 RR<br /> Silica Tabs</td> <td>120-60-60 kg NPK/ha<br /> + 1.25 kg/ha</td> <td>45 DAT</td> <td>122.03^bc</td> <td>14.83^de</td> <td>30.55^bc</td> <td>7.87^de</td> </tr> <tr> <td>T5- RRIF + 1.0 RR<br /> Silica Tabs</td> <td>120-60-60 kg NPK/ha<br /> + 1.25 kg/ha</td> <td>25 DAT</td> <td>125.62^ab</td> <td>17.38^b</td> <td>31.22^abc</td> <td>8.37^bcd</td> </tr> <tr> <td>T6- RRIF + 1.0 RR<br /> Silica Tabs</td> <td>120-60-60 kg NPK/ha<br /> + 2.5 kg/ha</td> <td>45 DAT</td> <td>122.86^bc</td> <td>15.75^cd</td> <td>30.61^bc</td> <td>8.30^bcde</td> </tr> <tr> <td>T7- RRIF + 0.6 RR<br /> Silica Tabs</td> <td>120-60-60 kg NPK/ha<br /> + 1.5 kg/ha</td> <td>25 DAT</td> <td>123.79^abc</td> <td>15.06^de</td> <td>30.59^bc</td> <td>8.30^bcde</td> </tr> <tr> <td>T8- RRIF + 0.6 RR<br /> Silica Tabs</td> <td>120-60-60 kg NPK/ha<br /> + 1.5 kg/ha</td> <td>45 DAT</td> <td>121.07^c</td> <td>15.10^de</td> <td>30.80^bc</td> <td>8.05^cde</td> </tr> <tr> <td>T9- RRIF + 2.0 RR<br /> Silica Tabs</td> <td>120-60-60 kg NPK/ha<br /> + 5 kg/ha</td> <td>25 DAT</td> <td>127.48^a</td> <td>18.56^a</td> <td>32.02^a</td> <td>9.00^a</td> </tr> <tr> <td>T10- RRIF + 2.0 RR<br /> Silica Tabs</td> <td>120-60-60 kg NPK/ha<br /> + 5 kg/ha</td> <td>45 DAT</td> <td>124.18^abc</td> <td>16.21^c</td> <td>31.45^ab</td> <td>8.67^ab</td> </tr> <tr> <td>T11- RR Silica Tabs</td> <td>5 kg/ha</td> <td>25 DAT</td> <td>114.20^d</td> <td>14.19^e</td> <td>30.34^bc</td> <td>7.73^e</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Rice affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Philippines </span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Findings showed that application of Silica Tabs Fertilizer at the rate of 2RR (5 kg/ha) at 25 DAT in combination with inorganic fertilizer applied at the rate of 120-20-60 kg NPK/ha produced the tallest plants at harvest, highest number of productive tiller, heaviest weight of 1000 grains, and highest grain yield in tons per hectare. Highest grain yield of 9 tons/ha was attained by the application of Silica Tabs Fertilizer at the rate of 5 kg/ha applied at 25 days after transplanting plus the application of recommended rate of inorganic fertilizer. At harvest, Silica Tabs applied alone at the rate of 5 kg/ha produced higher plants compared to that of RRIF application alone. Application of Silica Tabs alone or with inorganic fertilizer applied produced heights at 30 DAT and at harvest which were significantly taller than the unfertilized plants. Plants sprayed with Silica Tabs alone were more effective in tillers number than the application of inorganic fertilizer alone and significantly produced better results compared to the control.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><img alt="Yield quality of Rice affected by various kinds of fertilizers.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/61752/272/062/7e1ea935b088ed4aae6f4a8bce9e0ebe.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:16px;">(Yield quality of Rice affected by various kinds of fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">These results suggest that treatments leading to taller plants and higher yields were likely attributed to well-balanced nutrients provided by Silica Bubble Tabs. Inorganic-fertilized plots enriched with Silica Tabs played a significant role in increasing plant height and yield compared to plots with inorganic fertilizer alone. This underscores the beneficial impact of Silica Bubble Tabs when used in conjunction with inorganic fertilizer to boost rice yield, highlighting their complementarity in meeting the nutrient requirements of rice plants.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="300x300.ratio.jpg" height="500" link_url="/en/water_soluble_fertilizer/2668" src="/en/files/attach/images/61752/272/062/6ec30bc45eb2c569d72744e7d217fb21.jpg" style="width: 500px; height: 500px;" width="500" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/water_soluble_fertilizer/2668" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <style type="text/css">.tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; overflow:hidden;padding:12px 12px;word-break:normal; border-color:#c0c0c0;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle} .tg th{border-color:black;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px; font-weight:normal;overflow:hidden;padding:12px 12px;word-break:normal;background-color:#efefef;border-color:#c0c0c0;color:#000000;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle} </style> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/62272 /en/trial_results/62272#comment Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:04:05 +0900 /en/trial_results/61742 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Turf Grass Clipping Yield Increased After Application of Ultra Turf Green Nousbo Fertilizer in Philippines. Research Summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo Fertilizer 17-7-11 effect on Turf Grass clipping yields in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) is a type of NPK slow release fertilizer that contains the macro and micronutrients required for plant growth and development, including MU-type Urea. This fertilizer offers the advantage of reducing labor costs since it only requires a single application. It also provides a more even supply of nitrogen while reducing nitrogen leaching. The study of the effect of Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) Nousbo fertilizer on the clipping yields of turf grass was conducted in Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija, Philippines, from September 2019 to December 2019.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Golf Course in Philippines.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/742/061/c8cee2169e4c0e5512ea07fe95a4350a.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Golf Course in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Prior to the start of field experiment, soil sample was collected and brought in the soil laboratory for the analysis of N P. The analysis of soil sample showed low nitrogen, high phosphorus and deficient potassium. Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) fertilizer was applied one time at various rates from 0.5 to 2 of the Recommended Rate (RR) (15, 22.5, 30 (RR), 45 and 60 g/m²) and the treatments were evaluated to determine the efficacy on the yield of turf grass clippings. The inorganic fertilizer was applied in two split applications at basal and next application was after 15 days. Conventional fertilizer sources were complete fertilizer 14-14-14 (around 14 bags) and Urea 46-0-0 (around 2 bags). Clipping yields were gathered for eight harvesting periods (greens) in g/m2 then the average yield was calculated. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Weight of clippings of turf grass as affected by different rates of Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) fertilizer</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Weight of clippings of turf grass as affected by different rates of Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) fertilizer.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/742/061/aa563e4a94d5b77dbe1fe339ed236305.jpg" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Results showed that statistically significant effect on the clipping yields of turf grass was observed with the application of various rates of Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) Fertilizer. The heaviest weight of clippings collected from turf grass from first to eight harvesting periods was produced from the application of 2х recommended rate (2RR) of Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) Fertilizer at the rate of 60 g/m². This result is comparable to the application of 1.5 RR Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) Fertilizer during the second, third, six and eight observation periods with the rate of 45 g/m². These two rates of Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) fertilizer performed best on the clipping yields of turf grass and were significantly more effective compared to the application of conventional fertilizer.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Representative clippings of different treatments (RR &amp;ndash, Recommended Rate).jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/742/061/6a33f2343da58f0b3d728de2a9865769.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:16px;">(Representative clippings of different treatments (RR &ndash; Recommended Rate))</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Findings of the study revealed that the application of Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) Nousbo Fertilizer increases the clipping yields of turf grass. Therefore, in order to produce the heaviest yield of turf grass clippings, application of Ultra Turf Green (17-7-11) fertilizer at the rates of 45-60 g/m² is recommended. It can be applied once and the effect lasts for three (3) months. Smaller dosage is needed compared to dosage use in conventional fertilizer broadcasting method. It is safe and comprehensive to use. This fertilizer works well and safely on wide range of grasses without any damage.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="nousbo_ultraturf.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/742/061/52776abec2d017fa07794eeb4c624a0b.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/slow_release_fertilizer/2606" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/61742 /en/trial_results/61742#comment Mon, 15 May 2023 17:09:17 +0900 /en/trial_results/61714 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Rice yield when treated with Nousbo Fertilizers in Myanmar. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo Silica Bubble and Nutri Bubble Tabs effect on Rice growth and yield performances in Myanmar)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo Nutri Bubble is a fertilizer in the form of effervescent tablets, that contains multi EDTA &amp; EDDHA micro elements. Nutri Bubble fertilizer increases fruit set percentage by promoting formation of chlorophyll. Nousbo Silica Bubble is a Silicon and Potassium fertilizer, that increases crop yield and quality by thickening the cell wall and increasing the plant survival rates against pests, diseases, blast and lodging. The study of Nousbo fertilizers efficacy was conducted in order to investigate the effect of Silica and Nutri Bubble foliar fertilizers on Rice during the wet season of 2019 in the Myaungmya Research Farm, the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Rice field in Myanmar.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/714/061/c956663b90cf02d71c4321cd9f4ebb1d.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Rice field in Myanmar)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The following 8 treatments were used for this trial: T1 &ndash; (1:250 Silica Bubble), T2 &ndash; (1:500 Silica Bubble), T3 &ndash; (1:1000 Silica Bubble), T4 &ndash; (1:500 Silica + 1:1000 Nutri Bubble), T5 &ndash; (1:500 Silica + 1:2000 Nutri Bubble), T6 &ndash; (1:500 Silica Bubble and 1:4000 Nutri Bubble), T7 &ndash; (Farmers&rsquo; Practice), T8 &ndash; (No Fertilizer Application - Control).</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Application methods of different fertilizer rates.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/714/061/5fa829eeaed4a19e3e6aeb2d1b632eaf.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Application methods of different fertilizer rates)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The following parameters were assessed: Ripening Plant Height(cm), Filled Grain%, 1000 grain weight(g), Culm thickness base (mm), Culm thickness 6&rdquo;high (mm), Culm thickness 1&rsquo; high (mm) and Yield (bsk/acre). Results are summarized in the table and graph.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Rice affected by various kinds of treatments in Myanmar</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield and growth parameters of Rice affected by various kinds of treatments in Myanmar.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/714/061/155a793dbc9447e59ad6c2a66538e07f.jpg" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Effects of different fertilizer rates were not significantly different on plant height (cm) and filled grained percent by statistical analysis. However, 1000 grain weight of T1 (1:250) and T5 (1:500 Silica +1:2000 Nutri Bubble) were significantly higher than that of T3 (1:1000) and T8 (no fertilizer) but not higher than other fertilizer rates. It can be concluded that the higher rates of Silica Bubble and Nutri Bubble gave higher 1000 grain weight than lower Silica and Nutri bubble rates. Treatment 1 (1:250), Treatment 2 (1:500), Treatment 3 (1:1000), Treatment 5 (1:500 Silica +1:2000 Nutri Bubble) and Treatment 6 (1:500 Silica +1:4000 Nutri Bubble) gave good results of culm thickness of one feet height of rice. It can be concluded that the Silica Bubble and Nutri Bubble fertilizers intend to improve the culm thickness of rice.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Effect of different treatments on the Rice yield.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/714/061/b3963f4e86eb4f470b35412608763b46.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Effect of different treatments on the Rice yield)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Yields of different fertilizer rates were significantly higher than control (no fertilizer use). Yields of Treatment 1 (1:250), Treatment 4 (1:500 Silica+1:1000 Nutri Bubble) and Treatment 5 (1:500 Silica +1:2000 Nutri Bubble) were significantly higher than farmers&rsquo; practice. Therefore, it can be concluded that the application of Silica Bubble and Nutri Bubble fertilizers improves grain yield of rice. If the Silica itself (T1, T2 and T3) is singly applied, higher dosage can give higher yield. If combination of Silica Bubble and Nutri Bubble is applied, it may increase yield more than Silica Bubble itself alone (T4 and T5).</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Rice lodging prevention by application of Nousbo fertilizers.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/714/061/7db14b4c622b259efea02f86d30a182a.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Rice lodging prevention by application of Nousbo fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">According to this study, Treatment 4 (1:500 Silica Bubble + 1:1000 Nutri Bubble) and Treatment 5 (1:500 Silica Bubble + 1:2000 Nutri Bubble) foliar fertilizers are suitable for better results of rice grain yield and prevention for lodging.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="nousbo_silica bubble_product image.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/621/061/bae965970bd7b575db0eda91cc801d30.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/slow_release_fertilizer/2789" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="nousbo_nutri bubble_product image.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/621/061/7141ba63e7cef5715bb3585d426c9fae.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/special_fertilizer/27626" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/61714 /en/trial_results/61714#comment Tue, 02 May 2023 18:19:36 +0900 /en/trial_results/61621 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Chili growth and yield enhanced by Nousbo Fertilizers in Myanmar. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo Silica Bubble and Nutri Bubble Tabs effect on Chile growth and yield performances in Myanmar)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo Silica Bubble is a Silicon and Potassium fertilizer, which increases crop yield and quality by thickening the cell wall and increasing the plant survival rates against pests, deseases, blast and lodging. Nutri Bubble is a fertilizer in the form of effervescent tablets, which contains multi EDTA &amp; EDDHA micro elements. Nutri Bubble fertilizer increases fruit set percentage by promoting formation of chlorophyll. In order to investigate the effect of Silica and Nutri Bubble foliar fertilizers on Chili, the study of Nousbo fertilizers efficacy was conducted during the wet season of 2019 in the Yezin Agricultural University (YAU), the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Chili field in Myanmar_01.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/621/061/dafd40655fb6b89a4f276ed367bd1350.jpg" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Chili field in Myanmar_02.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/621/061/001657a7c3578a6c7018c608ffdb7476.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Chili field in Myanmar)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The following 8 treatments were used for this trial: T1 &ndash; (1:250 Silica Bubble), T2 &ndash; (1:500 Silica Bubble), T3 &ndash; (1:1000 Silica Bubble), T4 &ndash; (1:2000 Nutri Bubble), T5 &ndash; (1:3000 Nutri Bubble), T6 &ndash; (1:500 Silica Bubble and 1:2000 Nutri Bubble), T7 &ndash; (1:2000 Farmer Practice), T8 &ndash; (No Fertilizer Application - Control).</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Application methods of different fertilizer rates.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/621/061/ab3eb33a1fe1e36081bbabc43b255bfd.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Application methods of different fertilizer rates)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The following parameters were assessed: Plant height (cm), Number of branches per plant, Fruit weight (g), Number of fruits/plant and Fruit yield (kg/ha). Results are summarized in the table and graph.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Chili affected by various kinds of treatments in Myanmar</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield and growth parameters of Chili affected by various kinds of treatments in Myanmar.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/621/061/bec849b453ac38957b9cef6c78e37029.jpg" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Chili is a multiple-harvest crop if there is sufficient irrigation and fertilizer supply, therefore three harvests were implemented in this research. Average number of fruits per plant at the first harvest (90 DAT) was not significant among the treatments but the later harvests (104 DAT and 118 DAT) were significant with T4 (1:2000 Nutri Bubble) and T6 (1:500 Silica and 1:2000 Nutri Bubble) respectively. In the case of Yield, T1 (1:250 Silica Bubble) showed the maximum yield with 748 kg/ha, followed by T6 (1:500 Silica Bubble and 1:2000 Nutri Bubble), T4 (1:2000 Nutri Bubble) and T3 (1:1000 Silica Bubble). It can be concluded that higher rate of Silica Bubble (80g/20liter pump) reveals the highest yield. Comparing between T4 (1:2000 Nutri Bubble) and T7 (1:2000 Farmer Practice), Yield of the T4 (1:2000 Nutri Bubble) is 79% higher than T7 (Farmers Practice) and 212% higher than T8 (Control).</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Effect of different treatments on the Chili yield.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/621/061/21f4d87170eb60489e69a9fe57475ab5.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Effect of different treatments on the Chili yield)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">According to this study, Silica bubble tabs T3 (1:1000 Si, 20g/20liter pump) treatment, Nutri Bubble T4 (1:2000 Nutri, 10g/20liter pump) treatment and combined T6 (1:500 Silica Bubble:40g/20liter pump and 1:2000 Nutri Bubble, 10g/20liter pump) treatment of foliar fertilizers are suitable for Chili growing area for better yield results.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="nousbo_silica bubble_product image.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/621/061/bae965970bd7b575db0eda91cc801d30.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/slow_release_fertilizer/2789" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="nousbo_nutri bubble_product image.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/621/061/7141ba63e7cef5715bb3585d426c9fae.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/special_fertilizer/27626" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/61621 /en/trial_results/61621#comment Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:06:36 +0900 /en/trial_results/61587 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Rice yield increased after treatment with Nousbo One-Time Paddy Fertilizer in Philippines. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo One-Time Paddy effect on rice growth and yield performances in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo One-Time Paddy (29-4-6) is a slow release fertilizer, that requires only one time application until harvest and promotes the growth and development of roots. It contains humic acid to promote proper soil aggregation and fertility. Evaluation of Nousbo Fertilizer One-Time Paddy effectiveness on Rice Production was performed in Philippines (Brgy. Masiit, Calauan, Laguna location) from February to June 2020 in order to determine the efficacy of Nousbo fertilizer on improving transplanted rice production; to compare the effectiveness of the One-Time Paddy in promoting rice plant health and vigor at different rates and to generate data to be used for further product evaluation.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Rice field in Philippines.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/587/061/0f471724c9156a33bfdf237aecf91090.png" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Rice field in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo One-Time Paddy (OTP) was applied during rice transplanting. The following treatments were used for this trial: Treatment 1 - Farmer&rsquo;s Practice(FP); Treatment 2 &ndash; FP+One-Time Paddy 150kg/ha; Treatment 3 - FP+One-Time Paddy 200kg/ha and Treatment 4 - FP+One-Time Paddy 300kg/ha. The following parameters were assessed: plant height(cm) of 30 random plants at 30DAT and 50DAT, number of tillers at 50DAT of 30 random plants, percent of filled and unfilled grains per main panicle, mean weight per 1,000 grains(g) of 10 random plants and computed yield(kg/ha). Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><strong>Yield and growth parameters of Rice affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Philippines</strong> (Brgy. Masiit, Calauan, Laguna)</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield and growth parameters of Rice affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Philippines.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/587/061/dd4d1e58a1c729d771c930e89e23e1e7.jpg" /></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <em>*Data adjusted in order to account for harvest lost due to Typhoon Ambo</em></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">At 30DAT, the highest measured plant height average was observed on T4 plants with a mean of 32.247cm, followed closely by the rest of the treatments: T3 (31.297cm), T1 (31.003cm), and T2 (30.963cm). A very similar trend was observed at 50DAT with T4 plants having the highest observed mean plant height. The number of tillers were virtually the same as well. The number of filled grains vs unfilled grains ratio has been observed to be highest in T4 plants (85.31%:14.69%), followed closely by T3 plants (81.95%:18.05%), and then by T2 plants (73.10%:26.90%) and T1 plants (72.81%:27.19%). In terms of the mean weight per 1,000 grains, T4 plants again took the lead with a mean weight of 28.12g. The harvest yield for all treatments has been severely affected by Typhoon Ambo and heavy rains prior to harvesting. As such, the computed yield was multiplied by 3 times in order to account for the observed harvest loss, basing on an earlier (2 weeks prior to Typhoon Ambo&rsquo;s arrival) harvest data using the same rice variety. The highest yield was observed on T4 plants, with a computed yield of 5,892.86kg/ha, followed by T3 plants at 5,000kg/ha, and then by T1 plants at 4,642.86kg/ha and lastly by T2 plant with a computed yield of 4107.14kg/ha.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield quality of Rice affected by various kinds of fertilizers.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/587/061/e0c36fd880bede552f44288c15986c79.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Rice affected by various kinds of fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">This test was able to demonstrate the effectiveness of One-Time Paddy in rice production. The higher rate of Nousbo fertilizer (T4) has been found to increase the yield by more than 25%, while the lower rate of OTP has resulted in a slight increase in yield at around 7.69% compared to the control plants.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="One time_product_image.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/808/060/13ee86619cc0d4145caae0de7d823bc5.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/slow_release_fertilizer/2789" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/61587 /en/trial_results/61587#comment Thu, 20 Apr 2023 17:31:31 +0900 /en/trial_results/60993 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Oil Palm Tree growth when treated with Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in Indonesia. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 20-6-12 effect on Oil Palm Tree growth and yield performances in Indonesia)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 20-6-12+3MgO is a fertilizer in the form of granules coated with material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. In order to determine the effect of Nousbo CRF on the growth and yield of Oil Palm Tree, Nousbo CRF 20-6-12+3MgO was evaluated for its efficacy from August to January 2020 in Sandai, Ketapang Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Oil Palm nursery in Indonesia.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/993/060/beaa0f6cb613af542a7cf5fd295cbb97.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Oil Palm nursery in Indonesia)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 20-6-12+3MgO (Treatment &ldquo;A&rdquo;) was applied once as basal through dibbling at 50g/pot application rate. Conventional fertilizer sources were fertilizer 17-8-9+3MgO (Treatment &ldquo;B&rdquo;), fertilizer 20-6-12+3MgO (Treatment &ldquo;C&rdquo;), and fertilizer 20-6-12+3MgO +50g SOP (Treatment &ldquo;D&rdquo;). The following parameters were assessed at the 0, 2, 3 and 6th Month after Transplantation (MAT): Color of leaves, Number of leaves, Height of nursery tree and Length of stem. The total cost of growing one nursery oil palm pot was counted to make an economical comparison between products. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Oil Palm Tree affected by Nousbo CRF and other fertilizers in Indonesia</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield and growth parameters of Oil Palm Tree affected by Nousbo CRF and other fertilizers in Indonesia.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/993/060/32b8c4ce3f62f2b6546555ecb84c6c34.JPG" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">In overall result, Nousbo CRF 20-6-12+MgO showed better result than other fertilizers and was ranked either 1st or 2nd in each category. After the 6 months of the application, the plot &ldquo;A&rdquo; &ndash; treated with Nousbo fertilizer &ndash; showed the largest height increase and the highest increase in seedling circumference. The plot &ldquo;A&quot; and &ldquo;C&rdquo; showed the largest increase of leaf blade size and number of seedling leaves after the 6 months of the application. The cost of growing one oil palm pot with Nousbo fertilizer was found to be advantageous compared to other tested products.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield quality of Oil Palm Trees affected by various kinds of fertilizers.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/993/060/a388b146459d02c9ed06e5013797a48a.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Oil Palm Trees affected by various kinds of fertilizers (MAT- Month after Transplantation))</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF gave good response compared to other plots for all vegetative parameters such as height increase, stem circumference and number of seedling leaves up to 6 months after application, and also plants were visually healthy with good leaf color remained up to 9 month after application in the main palm nursery. Based on the results of the study, it may be concluded that substitution of Nousbo CRF 20-6-12 has positive influence on all growth parameters of Oil Palm Trees in Indonesia.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/60993 /en/trial_results/60993#comment Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:17:45 +0900 /en/trial_results/60880 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Rice production efficacy after treatment with Nousbo<br /> One Time Paddy in Vietnam. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo One Time Paddy effect on Rice growth and yield<br /> performances in Vietnam)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo One-Time Paddy (29-4-6) is a slow release fertilizer, that requires only one time application until harvest and promotes the growth and development of roots. It contains humic acid to promote proper soil aggregation and fertility. In order to evaluate the effects of One-Time Paddy on rice (indica), including the growth disease and pest resistance, yielding parameters, the trial was carried out from August to November 2017 at the Hau Giang Agricultural Hi-Tech Park, Hamlet Vinh Vien, Long My district, Hau Giang province, Vietnam. The rice variety used for this experiment was OM 5451 from Cuu Long Delta Rice Research Institute.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Rice field in Vietnam.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/880/060/063e8106fa9a1c19d2dc358a6cada2ab.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Rice field in Vietnam)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The recommended rate of conventional fertilizer was applied at 12 days after sowing (DAS) as 7kg/1300m² of Urea and 3kg/1300m² of DAP, at 17DAS as 5kg/1300m² of Urea, 4kg/1300m² of DAP and 3kg/1300m² of NPK 25-25-5, at 40-45DAS as 12kg/1300m² of NPK25-25-5(12kg/1300m²). Nousbo One Time Paddy was applied at 22-25DAS at the rate of 39 and 26kg/1300m², after application of Urea and DAP at 12 and 17DAS at the rate of 5kg/1300m² each every time.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Fertilizer test preparation in Hau Giang province Vietnam.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/880/060/1bde8ee46e8178f6a0f767a13f3cf351.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Fertilizer test preparation in Hau Giang province, Vietnam)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The following parameters were gathered: plant height, number of shoots and grain yield. Plan height of 10 shoots was measured using the measuring tape from the rice root to the highest peak. Number of shoots was evaluated by counting all shoots in the frame (25x30 cm). For grain yields measurement yield was collected from 3 frames (2x2.5m). After that, rice yield was threshed, dried, cleaned, weight and measured moisture separately at the lab. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Rice affected by One Time Paddy fertilizer in Vietnam</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield and growth parameters of Rice affected by One Time Paddy fertilizer in Vietnam.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/880/060/56f2f52bf1bb39d1155edcf887a9eb6f.JPG" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The effectiveness of One Time Paddy showed significant effect on the yield of Rice in Vietnam. The height and number of shoots of rice treated with Nousbo-One Time Paddy were higher than that of rice on control about 2.8cm and 22 shoots/m², respectively. The yield of rice treated with the Nousbo-One Time Paddy was increased by 0.85 tons/ha (18%) compared with control rice. In total, the Nousbo-One Time Paddy initially shows positive effects on the growth and yield of rice growing at the Hau Giang Agricultural Hi- Tech Park</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="One time_product_image.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/808/060/13ee86619cc0d4145caae0de7d823bc5.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/slow_release_fertilizer/2789" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/60880 /en/trial_results/60880#comment Tue, 04 Apr 2023 17:08:47 +0900 /en/trial_results/60808 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Corn yield and growth performance in response to application of Nousbo One Time and Black Urea Fertilizers in Mexico. Research Summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of One Time SRF and Black Urea effect on Corn growth and yield performances in Mexico)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Comprehensive study of Nousbo &ldquo;One Time&rdquo; SRF formula (29-4-6) in combination with Nousbo &ldquo;Black Urea (46-0-0)&rdquo; was performed in order to determine the effect of these two products on the growth and yield of Corn during the 2020 corn cycle in Tecualtitan Jalisco State, Mexico. One-Time is a slow release fertilizer, that requires only one time application until harvest and promotes the growth and development of roots. It contains humic acid to promote proper soil aggregation and fertility.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Corn farm in Mexico.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/808/060/c896ed29e482c6a842de451b797b2dcc.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Corn farm in Mexico)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Three treatments in the same field were done and the specific plot conditions were chosen. In the Nousbo section, farmers applied the following One Time/Black Urea mixture doses: 400kg/ha (300kg One Time &ndash; 150kg Black Urea), 400kg/ha (200kg One Time &ndash; 200kg Black Urea), 400kg/ha (250kg One Time &ndash; 150kg Black Urea). Conventional fertilizer treatment was 360kg of complex fertilizer (21-17-3) at seeding and second application of 400 kg/ha Urea. Yield was estimated based on direct corn cobs collected in the field. Comparative corn grain was obtained from 24 Corn cobs picked by hand by the team at the Farmer&acute;s site and Nousbo site. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield of Corn affected by various kinds of treatments</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield of corn affected by various kinds of treatments.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/808/060/bc65dc1ddfae4b8ce32be10a9e350aee.JPG" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The application of One Time and Black Urea mix showed noticeable effect on the yield of Corn. Conventional fertilizer treated plants had the lowest yield (4.76kg/ha) in comparison with Nousbo fertilizers treatment. One Time + Black Urea (250+150kg/ha) treated plants showed the greatest yield among the all treatments (5.53kg/ha).</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield quality of Corn affected by different treatments.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/808/060/a0f7d6a44f800f075a9c70fa3ec9f0a8.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Corn affected by different treatments)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Based on the results of the study, One Time and Black Urea mix is established as an efficient fertilizer mix suitable to be effectively used in the Mexican corn fields, showing a better performance when compared to the conventional fertilizer treatment. Even though Nousbo fertilizers were applied in a lower application rate (400kg/ha) in comparison with conventional fertilizer (760kg/ha), the yield was higher in Nousbo fertilizers treated plants.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="One time_product_image.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/808/060/13ee86619cc0d4145caae0de7d823bc5.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/slow_release_fertilizer/2789" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Gold urea_product_image.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/808/060/8f8c4dcd3f46b947974d0a03ea349869.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/special_fertilizer/27626" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/60808 /en/trial_results/60808#comment Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:43:20 +0900 /en/trial_results/60733 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Nousbo Jumbo Tabs evaluation results for Lime Tree in Mexico. Research Summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo Jumbo Tabs effect on Lime Tree growth and yield performances in Mexico)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo Jumbo Tabs NPK/MgO (13-11-2-5 + microelements + NPS) is a slow release nugget type fertilizer for tree, shrub and vine, that reduces labor costs by slowly releasing nutrients around the root zone for about 6 month. This fertilizer provides nutrients needed for growth and production of high quality fruits. In order to determine the effect of Nousbo Jumbo Tabs on the growth and yield of Lime Tree, the product was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Lime Trees from October 2019 to December 2019 in Tecoman town, Colima State, Mexico.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Lime Tree farm in Mexico.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/733/060/47e3746421aa000d897e89a858fa5716.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Lime Tree)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo Jumbo Tabs (27g) were manually applied once at the beginning of the test by burying tabs at a rate of 1 tab per hole, 20 tabs per tree evenly distributed around the dripping areas of the tree foliage, which is 540g per tree in total. No other fertilization was performed to any group during the time of the study. Conventional fertilizer used for this experiment was the granulated solid inorganic macronutrient fertilizer (12-8-16 +3 +TE) at the rate of 1000g per tree. Selected trees were located in the same area and had same height, comparable shape and size. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield of Lime Tree affected by various kinds of treatments</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield of Lime Tree affected by various kinds of treatments.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/733/060/717fd3942f575851942a7c428d5f92a6.JPG" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The application of Jumbo Tabs showed statistically significant effect on the yield of Lime Trees. With Jumbo Tabs fertilization, the buds were bigger and more resistant to falling-off. Lime tree blooming in the Jumbo Tabs group started 1 week before the control group, which was immediately perceived by the farmer as a great sign of efficacy. More flowers per tree were found with more retention at the tree stems and branches. For the first fruit harvest period, farmer reported an increase of 1.2 Kg more fruit per tree (+22.5%) in the Jumbo tab group vs control. This means the average fruit obtained in the Jumbo Tabs group was 5.6 kg/tree while only 4.34 kg/tree were obtained in the control fertilizer group. For the second harvest period farmer reported 10.3 kg of fruit for the Jumbo Tabs group and only 9.8 kg per tree in the control group (+4.85% yield with Nousbo product). For the third harvest period farmer obtained 4.0kg per tree with Nousbo fertilizer treatment while only 3.8kg with the control group (+5% yield with Nousbo fertilizer).</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Lime Tree.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/733/060/893368b3129540ec43662254adfdb144.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Lime Tree farm in Mexico)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Based on the results of the study, Nousbo Jumbo tabs is established as an efficient fertilizer suitable to be successfully used in the Mexican lime tree strain, showing a better performance when compared to the local fertilizer (both are SRF) during the entire test period. Even though both fertilizers are recommended to be applied every three months, it was very notorious that the farmer required to use around 50% less fertilizing with Nousbo Jumbo Tabs when compared with Control Fertilizer, obtaining superior results. The overall appearance, heath status and phenology of both groups was similar, but the final yield was superior in all Nousbo trees after 3 cuttings.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Nousbo_Jumbo tabs.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/733/060/58bec8107a111b63e86df4520b09ddfd.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/slow_release_fertilizer/2643" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/60733 /en/trial_results/60733#comment Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:17:31 +0900 /en/trial_results/60677 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Corn yield increased after treatment with Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in Philippines. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 effect on Corn growth and yield performances in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Proper use of fertilizer to satisfy plant needs is one of the component-input to increasing corn yield due to its content of several macro and micronutrients which are becoming deficient under natural ecosystem. Use of newly formulated Nousbo controlled release fertilizer (CRF) 28-5-10 can be a good alternative over conventional fertilizer due to its ability to provide nutrients in a controlled manner. Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 is a fertilizer in the form of granules coated with material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. In order to determine the effect of Nousbo CRF on the growth and yield of Corn and to confirm the effective rate of CRF that will produce the highest yield, CRF 28-5-10 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Corn from June 2018 to November 2018 in two locations in Philippines: Barangay Caurdanetaan, Umingan, Pangasinan (Barangay) and Barangay Bantug, Science City of Munoz, Nueva Ecja (Barangay Nueva Evja).</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Corn field in Philippines.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/677/060/9ab8fa89d3acdbded00b91e12e73a7cc.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Corn field in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The recommended rate of conventional fertilizer was applied based on soil analysis recommendation at the rate of 120-20-30kg NP2O5K2O per hectare in Barangay and 120-40-30kg NP2O5K2O per hectare in Barangay, Nueva ecija, applied as basal and top dressing. Inorganic fertilizer sources were complete fertilizer 14-14-14 and Urea 46-0-0 and Muriate of Potash. CRF 28-5-10 was applied once as basal through dibbling. The following data were gathered: plant height(cm) at 30DAT, total number and weight of harvested marketable corn ears and computed yield (tons/ha). Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Corn affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Barangay and Barangay, Nueva ecija</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield and growth parameters of Corn affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Barangay and Barangay, Nueva ecija.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/677/060/f49628ced847e3edfe8e35c76b865435.JPG" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Highly significant effect on the different agronomic and yield parameters of corn were observed from plants treated with CRF in both locations. Application of CRF 28-5-10 at the rate of 5g/hill applied as basal in Barangay location produced the tallest plants at 30 DAT (103.10cm), highest number (around 91 corn ear/plot with highest weight (18.62kg/plot)) of marketable ears per plot and highest computed yield (11.64tons/ha). Insignificant differences on the above agronomic characteristics were obtained from the application of CRF 28-5-10 at the rate of 4g/hill. Similar result was observed in Barangay, Nueva ecija location. Application of CRF 28-5-10 at the rate of 5g/hill applied as basal in Barangay, Nueva ecija location produced the tallest plants at 30 DAT (82.92cm), highest number (around 81 corn ear/plot with highest weight (16.58kg/plot)) of marketable ears per plot and highest computed yield (10.36tons/ha).</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield quality of Corn affected by various kinds of fertilizers.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/677/060/ab6b2b8b6314d5d8eac64a899a968dbd.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Corn affected by various kinds of fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Application of CRF at the rate of 5g/hill applied as basal produced the tallest plants at 30DAT, highest number and weight of marketable ear and highest computed yield. Plants applied with CRF 28-5-10 at the rate of 4g/hill produced statistically similar result. Findings showed that the recommended rate of CRF 28-5-10 for corn production is 4-5g/hill applied as basal through dibbling.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/60677 /en/trial_results/60677#comment Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:22:49 +0900 /en/trial_results/60514 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Cabbage production efficacy after treatment with<br /> Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in Philippines.<br /> Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 26-5-12 effect on Cabbage growth and yield performances in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 26-5-12 is a fertilizer in the form of granules coated with material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. In order to determine the effect of Nousbo CRF on the growth and yield of Tomato and to confirm the effective rate of CRF that will produce the highest yield, CRF 26-5-12 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Cabbage from November 2018 to March 2019 in two locations in Philippines: Barangay Caurdanetaan, Umingan, Pangasinan (Barangay) and Barangay Bantug, Science City of Munoz, Nueva Ecja (Barangay Nueva Evja).</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Cabbage field in Philippines.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/514/060/91df85023097cf139b5323700de47471.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Cabbage field in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The recommended rate of conventional fertilizer was applied based on soil analysis recommendation at the rate of 150-30-40kg NP2O5K2O per hectare in Barangay and 150-40-60kg NP2O5K2O per hectare in Barangay, Nueva ecija, applied as basal and top dressing. Inorganic fertilizer sources were complete fertilizer 14-14-14, Urea 46-0-0 and Muriate of Potash. CRF 26-5-12 was applied once as basal through dibbling. The following data were gathered: days to head formation, plant height(cm) at heading stage, average weight of head (g) and computed yield (tons/ha). Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Cabbage affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Barangay and Barangay, Nueva ecija</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield and growth parameters of Cabbage affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Barangay and Barangay, Nueva ecija.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/514/060/fab29297e41031c8d8a704fbe43589b0.JPG" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The effectiveness of CRF 26-5-12 showed statistically significant effect on the yield of Cabbage in both locations. Basal application of CRF 26-5-12 in Barangay location and Barangay, Nueva ecija location at 5g/hill took the shortest number of days from transplanting to about 50% of the plants to produced heads. The tallest plant height at heading stage was obtained by the application of CRF 26-5-12 at the rate of 5g/hill (27.33cm) in Barangay and (26.14cm) in Barangay, Nueva ecija. Average weight of cabbage head was found to be heaviest (1279.33g in Barangay and 1253.33g in Barangay, Nueva ecija) from plants harvested on plots treated with CRF 26-5-12 at the rate of 5g/hill. Application of CRF 26-5-12 at the rate of 5g/hill produced the highest weight of marketable heads per plot in both locations.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="Yield quality of Cabbage affected by various kinds of fertilizers.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/514/060/24b219f9b33ceec278c7348be3519509.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Cabbage affected by various kinds of fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Based on the results of the study, application of CRF 26-5-12 at the rate of 5g/hill is recommended for producing the highest marketable yield of cabbage. However, to lessen the expense of small-farmer cabbage grower 4g/hill can also be applied.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/60514 /en/trial_results/60514#comment Wed, 08 Mar 2023 13:37:33 +0900 /en/trial_results/60321 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Tomato growth performance in response to Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer application in Philippines. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 20-7-12 effect on Tomato growth and yield performances in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 20-7-12 is a fertilizer in the form of granules coated with material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. CRF 20-7-12 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Tomato from September 2018 to February 2019 in two locations in Philippines: Barangay Caurdanetaan, Umingan, Pangasinan and Barangay Bantug, Science City of Munoz, Nueva Ecja, in order to determine the effect of Nousbo CRF on the growth and yield of Tomato and to confirm the effective rate of CRF that will produce the highest yield.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Tomato field in Philippines.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/321/060/11066caee8c68d4e7660c5eb7befa6e5.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Tomato field in Philippines)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The recommended rate of conventional fertilizer was applied based on soil analysis recommendation. Conventional fertilizer sources were complete fertilizer 14-14-14 and Urea 46-0-0. The recommended rate was 90-60-20kg NP2O5K2O per hectare in Barangay and 90-30-30kg NP2O5K2O per hectare in Barangay, Nueva ecija, applied as basal and top dressing. CRF 20-7-12 was applied once as basal through dibbling or per hill application. Number of marketable fruits, total weight (kg) of marketable fruits per 10 randomly selected sample plants, computed yield in tons per hectare were assessed. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Tomato affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Barangay and Barangay, Nueva ecija</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Yield and growth parameters of Tomato affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Barangay and Barangay, Nueva ecija.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/321/060/76d6d088f3fee3db00af10cc3bb28887.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">In Barangay location tomato plants applied with CRF 20-7-12 at 5 g/hill produced the highest weight of marketable fruits of 49.50 tons per hectare that translates to around 53% increase in yield compared with the yield of plants that were applied only with recommended rate of conventional fertilizer. It can be noted however, that the application of CRF 20-7-12 at 3-4 g/hill can be used economically which provided an increase of 11 to 30% over the application of conventional fertilizer. In Barangay, Nueva ecija location the trend was similar: plants treated with CRF at 5 g/hill produced the highest weight of marketable fruits of 57.07 tons per hectare that translates to around 72% increase in yield compared with the yield of plants that were applied with conventional fertilizer. Application of CRF 20-7-12 at 3-4 g/hill can be used economically which provided an increase of 30 to 50% over the application of conventional fertilizer.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Yield quality of Tomato affected by various kinds of fertilizers.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/321/060/3be3acddcd2682a8814d275282cacd46.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Tomato affected by various kinds of fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Results showed the statistically significant effect of the effectiveness of CRF 20-7-12 on the yield of tomato. Highest number and heaviest weight of marketable fruits were harvested using the CRF 20-7-12 at 5g/hill applied as basal. The effect of CRF 20-7-12 was compared to the application of conventional fertilizer at the recommended rate of N-P2O5-K2O. As compared to conventional application of fertilizer, various rates of CRF 20-7-12 (3, 4, 5 g/hill, respectively) produced the higher number and weight of marketable fruits per 10 randomly selected plants per plot. Based on the results of the study, application of CRF 20-7-12 at the rate of 5 g/hill is recommended for producing the highest marketable fruit yield of tomato.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/60321 /en/trial_results/60321#comment Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:14:08 +0900 /en/trial_results/59917 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Corn growth and yield when treated with Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in India. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 effect on Corn growth and yield performances in India)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Proper use of fertilizer to satisfy plant needs is one of the component-input to increasing corn yield due to its content of several macro and micronutrients which are becoming scarce under natural ecosystem. Use of newly formulated controlled release fertilizer can be one of the alternatives over conventional fertilizer and can be a substitute due to its ability to provide nutrients in a controlled manner. Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 is a controlled release fertilizer with granules coated with material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. This fertilizer is applied in order to maximize nutrition efficiency while minimizing nutrient losses. More importantly, the release of nutrients is designed in a synchronize way to meet the changing crop nutrient requirement.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Corn field in India.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/917/059/6d7e399be5eecd2265ed3f801961e358.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Corn field in India)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Corn from March to July, 2019 in two locations: the Department of Horticulture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS) and the Bhiskuri farmer&rsquo;s village, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India. The fertilizers that were used for the conventional treatment plots were Urea, DAP, and MOP at the rate of 265kg/ha, 100kg/ha, and 65kg/ha, respectively. Urea was applied in 2 split dosages (1st at transplanting and 2nd at 30 DAT). DAT and MOP were applied at transplanting at full dose. CRF 21-6-10 was applied once as basal through dibbling or per plant application at the rate of 3, 4 and 5g/plant. Agronomic performance parameters such as Plant height (cm) at 30DAT, Total weight (kg) of marketable ears per plot at harvest, Ear length (cm) at harvest, Ear diameter (cm) at harvest, Plant biomass (weight in kg) of 10-sample plants at harvest and Yield (kg/plot) were measured. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Corn affected by various kinds of fertilizers in SHUATS and Bhiskuri Village</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="India_corn_table.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/917/059/73e624dc72c245079a8cf019518c5cb7.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The data from SHUATS and Bhiskuri locations showed that the application of CRF at the rate of 5 g/plant produced the tallest plants at 30 DAT. In SHUATS location CRF treated plots at the rate of 5g/plant produced ear with diameter 33.3% larger and 23% heavier than that of the conventional fertilizer treated plots. The plant biomass of CRF treated plots at the rate of 4g/plant and 5g/plant was significantly higher than one of conventional fertilizer treated plots which had an advantage of 12% and 32% respectively relative to conventional fertilizer treated plots. It is notable that the kg yield of CRF treated plots at the rate of 5g/plant had yield advantage of approximately 22.7% relative to plots treated with conventional fertilizer. In Bhiskuri location CRF at the rate of 5 g/plant produced the highest length and diameter of corn ear. Maximum weight of marketable corn ear and the highest corn yield were obtained from the application of CRF at the rate of 5 g/plant.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Yield quality of Corn affected by various kinds of fertilizers.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/917/059/f0f37ce40f1d372e520f4b50c8e4e4df.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Corn affected by various kinds of fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">This study showed that the highest corn yield can be attained by application of Nousbo controlled release of fertilizer 28-5-10 at the rate of 4 to 5 g/plant provided that there is no erratic change in climatic condition. Based on the results of the study, it may be concluded that substitution of CRF fertilizers has positive effect on plant height, total weight(kg) of marketable ears, plant biomass and yield of Corn.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/59917 /en/trial_results/59917#comment Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:46:15 +0900 /en/trial_results/59803 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Cabbage yield increased after treatment with Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in India. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 25-4-8 effect on Cabbage growth and yield performances in India)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Cabbage feed on water and nutrients in the soil. But sometimes, the natural nutrient-content of the soil is not enough. Basal application of controlled released fertilizer per plant can be done in order to continuously provide required amount of nutrients for crop needs to grow better and produce larger yield. The application of NOUSBO controlled release fertilizer has the ability to provide nutrients in a controlled manner. Therefore CRF 25-4-8 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Cabbage from March to July, 2019 in two locations in India: Department of Horticulture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS) and Bhiskuri Farmer&rsquo;s Village, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Cabbage field in India.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/803/059/0fe8d6017eb78dddcf030c0aecccb2e7.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Cabbage field in India)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 25-4-8 is a controlled release fertilizer with granules coated with material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. CRF 25-4-8 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Cabbage. The conventional fertilizers that were used for the control were Urea, DAP, and MOP at the rate of 266kg/ha, 130kg/ha, and 130kg/ha, respectively. Urea was applied in 2 split dosages (1st at transplanting, and 2nd at 30 DAT). DAP and MOP were applied at transplanting in full dose. CRF 25-4-8 was applied once at basal through dibbling at the rate of 3, 4 and 5g/plant. Growth parameters such days to head formation, plant height at heading stage, average weight of head (g), computed yield in tons per hectare were assessed using 10 sample plants. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Cabbage affected by various kinds of fertilizers in SHUATS and Bhiskuri Village</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="India_cabbage_table_01.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/803/059/3a9dfab41c1a7c6d4795f86c79090477.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The data from SHUATS showed that early head formation can be obtained by the application of CRF at 4 and 5 g/plant. The application of CRF at the rate of 4 g/plant or 5 g/plant performed better in producing Cabbage yield per plot. Highest weight of marketable cabbage heads were harvested from plants grown on the CRF treated plots at the rate of 4-5 g/plant. In Bhiskuri location both CRF applications of 4g/plant and 5g/plant were significantly different from that of the conventional fertilizer applied plot having relative advantage of 43.5% and 66.9% for CRF treatments of 4g/plant and 5g/plant, respectively.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Yield quality of Cabbage affected by various kinds of fertilizers.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/803/059/eeb7c6535a782ef37bd71227b78a4b0f.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Cabbage affected by various kinds of fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Based on the results of the study, it may be concluded that substitution of conventional fertilizers has influence on days to head formation, plant height at heading stage, average weight of 10 cabbage heads, marketable yield/plot and yield/ha of cabbage heads. Highest cabbage head yield can be attained by application of controlled release fertilizer at the rate of 4 to 5 g/plant.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/59803 /en/trial_results/59803#comment Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:47:46 +0900 /en/trial_results/59261 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Tomato production efficacy after treatment with Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in India. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 21-6-10 effect on Tomato growth and yield performances in India)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Sustainable crop production became one of the world&rsquo;s priorities for the last ten years as a result of the bigger concern for growing population. Tomato production must signify the ability to produce high yield and this can be attained by the proper use of fertilizer and modern fertilization technique. The use of controlled release fertilizer to satisfy the needs of the plant is one way of increasing the nutrient availability in its proper time for the growth and development of crops for better yield. Nousbo CRF 21-6-10 is a controlled release fertilizer with granules coated with polymer material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. This fertilizer is applied in order to maximize nutrition efficiency while minimizing nutrient losses.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="India_tomato_farm.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/261/059/f452c4fd3a556e34a7bae162f3e2df03.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Tomato farm)</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">CRF 21-6-10 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Tomato from March to July, 2019 in two locations. The first experimental site was at the Department of Horticulture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS) and the second was at Bhiskuri farmer&rsquo;s village, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India. The fertilizers that were used for the conventional treatment plots were Urea, DAP, and MOP at the rate of 240kg/ha, 100kg/ha, and 100kg/ha, respectively. CRF 21-6-10 was applied once as basal through dibbling or per plant application at the rate of 3, 4 and 5g/plant. Growth parameters such as number of fruits/10plants, total weight of marketable and non-marketable fruits/10plants (kg), computed yield in tons per hectare were assessed. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><strong>Yield and growth parameters of Tomato affected by various kinds of fertilizers in SHUATS and Bhiskuri Village</strong></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="India_tomato_table_01.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/261/059/eee7f946857d408bfaf699fa5bcb2299.JPG" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The data from SHUATS and Bhiskuri Village showed that number of tomato fruits was significantly influenced by the application rate of CRF. The highest values of number of fruits in SHUATS were 538 followed by 532 with the treatment CRF 5g and CRF 4g, respectively. The highest number of fruits in Bhiskuri Village were 260.00 and 242.33 with the treatment CRF 5g and CRF 4g, respectively. Results revealed that the highest weight of marketable fruits in SHUATS (62.64 kg) was produced by the plants grown on plots applied with CRF at the rate of 4 and 5g/plant. Same result was observed in Bhiskuri Village. CRF at the rates of 4g and 5g/plant had a relative advantage of 10.9% and 24.7% over conventional fertilizer treated plots in terms of computed yield per hectare in Bhiskuri Village.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><img alt="India tomato result comparison.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/261/059/4662e35adffa1c6689e2fd7909e26be4.JPG" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Tomato affected by various kinds of fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Less amount of Nousbo CRF 21-6-10 per hectare lead to a greater supply of soil available nutrients than higher amount of conventional fertilizer per hectare, thus creating a favorable nutritional environment for intensive growth of Tomato. In addition, among the CRF 3, 4 and 5 g/plant treatment plots, CRF 5g/plant treatment showed the highest result in the average number of marketable Tomato fruits in both locations.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/59261 /en/trial_results/59261#comment Fri, 03 Feb 2023 14:30:26 +0900 /en/trial_results/58896 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Corn growth performance in response to Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer application in Malaysia. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 effect on Corn growth and yield attributes in Malaysia)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 is a fertilizer which each grain is coated with polymer that can control the rate, pattern and duration of nutrient release and contains all NPK required for plant growth and development. CRF 28-5-10 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Corn from March to July, 2019 in two locations with similar soil properties: MARDI Serdang and MARDI Cameron Highland, Malaysia, in order to determine the effect of Nousbo CRF on the growth and yield of Corn and to confirm the effective rate of CRF that will produce the highest yield.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><img alt="Malaysia-corn_farm_01.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/896/058/4292f72ff91071ec89d14d29e825f538.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Corn farm in Malaysia)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 was tested using the following treatments: Control (without fertilizer), Recommended Rate of Conventional Fertilizer as basal and side dressing and Nousbo CRF at 3, 4 and 5 g/plant application rates applied once at basal. The values of Plant height, SPAD, Leaf fresh weight, Root dry weight were measured at 45 days after transplanting and Corn weight without husk leaf, Corn length were assessed at harvest. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:22px;">Yield and growth parameters of Corn as affected by treatments in Serdang and Cameron Highland</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Malaysia corn_table_01.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/896/058/bc5a133858af684b05755506d0f83d37.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Vegetative growth results show that the advantage of CRF versus conventional fertilizer was clearly realized at 45 days after transplanting. It is obvious that the rate of CRF at 5 grams/plant was better than that of conventional fertilizer treated plants in all aspects of vegetative growth in terms of plant height, SPAD values, leaf fresh weight, root dry weight in both locations. This gives CRF user a potential of having improved yield ultimately if the rate of 5 grams/plant is used. The weight of marketable yield obtained in plants treated with the highest dosage of CRF exceeded significantly that of the value of the crops treated with conventional fertilizer.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Malaysia corn result comparison.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/896/058/92eba75fa824bd5cd6a4928a9e4c04a0.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">The average advantage of 5g/plant CRF-treated plots over conventional fertilizer- treated fertilizer was 10.3% for the Serdang experiment and 9.5% for the Cameron experiment. It can therefore be recommended that the rate of CRF at 5 grams/plant assuming an economic advantage of conventional fertilizer could replace the existing fertilization practices.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/58896 /en/trial_results/58896#comment Fri, 13 Jan 2023 10:00:39 +0900 /en/trial_results/58669 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:40px;"><strong>Chili pepper growth and yield performance when treated with Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in Malaysia. Research summary</strong></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 21-6-10 efficacy on Chili pepper growth and yield performances in Malaysia)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 21-6-10 is fertilizer in the form of polymer-coated granules that can provide slow-release nutrients to plants throughout the growing season. CRF 21-6-10 was evaluated for its efficacy for Chili from March to July, 2019 in two locations in Malaysia with similar soil properties: MARDI Serdang and MARDI Cameron Highland, in order to determine the effect of Nousbo CRF on the growth and yield performances of Chili and to confirm the effective rate of CRF that will produce the highest yield.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><img alt="Chili_farm_01.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/669/058/18b0570ae7505dc68acf540d358bf763.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:14px;">(Chili farm)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">For both two locations, the CRF 21-6-10 efficiency was tested using the following treatments: Control (without fertilizer), Recommended Rate of Conventional Fertilizer and CRF at 3, 4 and 5 g/plant application rates. Data for growth and development was recorded by assessment of the plant height at 61 days after transplanting and total yield per plant at harvest. The values of SPAD, which reflects the approximate nitrogen content, were gathered at 61 days after transplanting. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:20px;"><strong>Yield and growth parameters of Chili affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Serdang and Cameron Highland</strong></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Chili_table_01.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/669/058/a0f032b33c2327268db86484f95dac06.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Results showed that plants from all the plots treated with CRF were significantly taller than the plants treated with conventional fertilizer. Furthermore, the tallest plants were produced in plots treated with 5g/plant CRF and were taller than all the other treatments in both locations. SPAD values obtained in the Serdang experiment showed that CRF treated plants produced SPAD values higher than that of the plots treated with conventional fertilizer. Analysis of Chili yield revealed that CRF treatments of 4g/plant and 5g/plant had a yield advantage of 11.1% and 15.5%, respectively, over the conventional fertilizer-treated plots in Serdang. The same pattern was observed in the plants grown in Cameron Highland. Results show that application of 4 and 5g/plant of CRF in Cameron Highland was advantageous over conventional treated plots with a yield advantage of 12.1% and 16.6% respectively. The best yield plants in this experiment for both locations were obtained from plants treated with 4 and 5 grams/plant CRF.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><img alt="Chili result comparison.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/669/058/352bd698f809f593386d156323c61adc.JPG" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">One-time basal application of Nousbo CRF 21-6-10 significantly increased the supply of available nutrients in the soil, thereby creating an advantageous nutrient environment for intensive growth of Chili. Furthermore, among the plots treated with CRF 3, 4 and 5 g/plant, the treatment with CRF 5 g/plant showed the highest results for mean Chili weight, height and SPAD values in both locations.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/58669 /en/trial_results/58669#comment Thu, 05 Jan 2023 16:12:08 +0900 /en/trial_results/58574 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:40px;"><strong>Cabbage growth and yield when treated with Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in Malaysia. Research summary</strong></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 25-4-8 effect on Cabbage growth and yield performances in Malaysia)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Nousbo CRF 25-4-8 is a kind of fertilizer in the form of granules coated with polymer that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. CRF 25-4-8 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Cabbage from March to July, 2019 in two locations with similar soil properties: MARDI Serdang and MARDI Cameron Highland, Malaysia, in order to determine the effect of Nousbo CRF on the growth and yield of cabbage and to confirm the effective rate of CRF that will produce the highest yield.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><img alt="Cabbage-farm.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/574/058/63d6328a7775280421acd82c0d375d78.jpg" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:14px;">(Cabbage farm)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">CRF 25-4-8 was tested using the following treatments: Control (without fertilizer), Recommended Rate of Conventional Fertilizer and CRF at 3, 4 and 5 g/plant application rates. Plant height, individual weight of heads, total marketable yield and computed yield were assessed. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Cabbage affected by various kinds of fertilizers in Serdang and Cameron Highland</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Cabbage table.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/574/058/122e46d2e8e55570750b9922b0562eed.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Analysis of plant height revealed that CRF dosages were directly proportional to the plant height. Thus, the tallest plants were obtained in CRF at 5g/plant treatment in both locations and the plants were 9.6% and 18.3% taller relative to conventional fertilizer for Serdang and Cameron Highland experiment, respectively. The results of average head weight showed that all the CRF-treated plots in Serdang produced 35.2%-63.4% heavier heads compared to that of the conventional fertilizer-treated plots with the best result in plots treated with 5g/plant of CRF at the value averaging 1.26 kg/head. In Cameron Highland location plots treated with 4 and 5 grams/plant of CRF showed the highest values of average head weight (1.169 and 1.28 kg/head, respectively). Experiment also revealed that all the plots treated with CRF had significantly heavier marketable yield as compared to the plots treated with conventional fertilizers. In terms of computed yield per hectare, the experiment in Serdang has showed that CRF treated plants at any rate produced from 54.5% to 75.3% higher yield compared to that of the conventional fertilizer treated plants. In the case of the Cameron Highland experiment CRF 5g/plant treatment obtained the highest yield among the treatments at the value of 45.73 tons/hectare.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><img alt="Cabage result comparison.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/574/058/5156dd9e65bc91822552b2216ae80ffb.JPG" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(Yield quality of Cabbage affected by various kinds of fertilizers)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;">Single basal application of Nousbo CRF 25-4-8 apparently lead to a greater supply of soil available nutrients, thus creating a favorable nutritional environment for intensive growth of Cabbage. In addition, among the CRF 3, 4 and 5 g/plant treatment plots, CRF 5g/plant treatment showed the highest result in the average Cabbage head weight and plant height in both locations.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/58574 /en/trial_results/58574#comment Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:57:23 +0900 /en/trial_results/58547 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Cucumber yield increased by application of Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in Thailand. Research Summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 20-7-12 effect on Cucumber growth and yield in Thailand)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">Application of CRFs to satisfy the physiological requirements at different growth stages of plants is one of the ways to increase the nutrient availability for better yield. In this study Nousbo CRF 20-7-12 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Cucumber from August to January, 2018-2019 in two locations in Thailand: King Mongut&rsquo;s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL) in Bangkok, which is considered as field with low soil fertility, and Chiang Mai University in Chiang Mai Province, which is considered as field with common soil fertility.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Cucumber farm.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/547/058/f4ab8005fdfff6d8ffda001a08e5bae8.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">(Cucumber farm)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo CRF 20-7-12 is a fertilizer in the form of granules coated with polymer material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of the nutrient release. Nousbo CRF efficiency was evaluated at the rate of 3, 4 and 5 g/plant as a single base fertilizer which is equal to 150 kg/ha, 200 kg/ha and 250 kg/ha, respectively, and compared with conventional fertilizer (500 kg/ha of 25-7-7 fertilizer plus 500 kg/ha of 8-24-24 fertilizer plus 500 kg/ha of 8-24-24 fertilizer as side-dressing), which equals to 1500 kg/ha in total. Number of fruits per plant, total weight of marketable and non-marketable fruits were assessed at harvest. SPAD (soil plant analysis development) chlorophyll meter reading was also recorded at 15, 30 and 45 days after treatment. Results are summarized in the following table and graph. </span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Cucumber affected by various kinds of CRF fertilizers at KMITL and Chiang Mai</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><img alt="Cucumber table.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/547/058/de6859cf163a24c4de6867a1e72440ce.JPG" /></span></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Cucumber chart_01.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/547/058/54b2a7dfe362f066c66554e535b94b4a.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">Analysis of the growth and yield parameters confirmed that the appearance quantity and quality of cucumber fruits was higher for all CRF treatments compared with conventional fertilizer plots. The number of marketable fruits in KMITL was 12188, 13594, and 51563 fruits/ha by application of CRFs at the rate of 3, 4 and 5 g/plant respectively, while only 2343.80 fruits/ha were observed from conventional fertilizer-treated plots. Another promising finding was that the weight of marketable fruits was 1.43, 2.31, and 10.43 ton/ha in the CRFs treated plots at the rate of 3, 4 and 5 g/plant, compared to 0.43 ton/ha of cucumbers collected from plot treated with conventional fertilizer. CRF 5 g/plant treated plants had the highest SCMR followed by the plants treated with CRFs at the rate of 4 and 3 g/plant and conventional fertilizer.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Cucumber chart_02.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/547/058/80818875a01343c18f5b72b11ec41d4c.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">This study demonstrated that the yield of cucumber was significantly higher for all CRF-treated plots compared with conventional fertilizer in KMITL and there was a slight increase in cucumber yield between CRF 3, 4, and 5 g/plant treatments and conventional fertilizer treatment in Chiang Mai. Furthermore, CRF treatments showed higher average fresh weight than conventional treatment. Among those CRF 3, 4 and 5 g/plant treated plots, CRF 5g/plant had the highest result in the average fresh weight in KMITL location, and CRF 4g/plant treatment showed the highest fresh weight in Chiang Mai location. These results confirm that CRF 20-7-12 can be a great alternative over conventional fertilizers and become a substitute due to its ability to provide nutrients to Cucumber plants in a controlled manner.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" height="500" link_url="http://product.nousbo.com/hi-cote/" open_window="Y" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" style="width: 500px; height: 500px;" width="500" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://product.nousbo.com/hi-cote/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/58547 /en/trial_results/58547#comment Tue, 27 Dec 2022 11:07:41 +0900 /en/trial_results/58479 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Sweet Corn growth and yield enhanced by Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in Thailand. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 effect on Sweet Corn growth and yield performances in Thailand)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">Use of newly formulated CRFs is a great alternative over conventional fertilizers and can become a substitute due to its ability to provide nutrients in a controlled manner. Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 is a fertilizer in the form of granules coated with polymer material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. In this study Nousbo CRF 28-5-10 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Sweet Corn from August to January, 2018-2019 in two locations in Thailand: King Mongut&rsquo;s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL) field in Bangkok, which is considered as field with low soil fertility, and Chiang Mai University field in Chiang Mai Province, which is considered as field with common soil fertility.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="corn-farm.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/479/058/8f4b7b25bd203580266a6c663a808a11.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">(Sweet corn farm)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">For both two locations, Nousbo CRF efficiency was evaluated at the rate of 3, 4 and 5 g/plant as a single base fertilizer which is equal to 240 kg/ha, 320 kg/ha and 460 kg/ha respectively, and compared with conventional fertilizer (400 kg/ha of 15-15-15 basal fertilizer plus 400 kg/ha of 46-0-0 side-dressed fertilizer plus 400 kg/ha of 15-15-15 side-dressed fertilizer), which total amount is 1200 kg/ha. Plant height at 15, 30 and 60 days after planting, plant fresh and dry weight, ear weight, length, width, diameter and total ear weight at the harvest were assessed. SPAD (soil plant analysis development) chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR), which indicates chlorophyll density in leaves was also recorded at 15, 30 and 60 days after planting. Results are summarized in the following table and graphs.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Sweet Corn affected by various kinds of CRF fertilizers at KMITL and Chiang Mai</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="sweet corn table.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/479/058/1a07b32d7707ea634942bfecca87a481.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="sweet corn chart_03.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/479/058/72aa4b1fec7049274e6f717b711ae045.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">Analysis of plant height showed that the biggest plants could be obtained in plots treated with CRF 5g/plant treatment (120cm) followed by CRF 4g/plant (102cm), 3g/plant (83cm) and conventional fertilizer treatments (63cm) in KMITL field and the trend was similar for Chiang Mai experimental field. Moreover, CRF 5 g/plant treatment showed the highest chlorophyll index followed by the CRFs applied at 4 and 3 g/plant application rate and conventional fertilizer treatment. Analysis of the shoot fresh and dry weight of plants in KMITL experimental field showed that both fresh and dry weight production significantly increased in response to controlled release fertilizer application. The trend was similar for shoot dry weight with the highest shoot dry weight detected in response to soil-applied CRF 5 g/plant treatment followed by CRF 4 and 3 g/plant treatments, conventional fertilizer treatment, while control treatment had the lowest production of shoot dry weight. Similar trends of treatment effects on other sweet corn yield parameters such as total ear weight, ear weight without shell, ear width, ear length and ear diameter were found as well. </span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="sweet corn chart_03_02.JPG" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/479/058/c4252c60a94848a04c81604264d906a3.JPG" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">From this study it was determined that single basal application of CRFs obviously lead to a greater supply of soil available nutrients, thus creating a favorable nutritional environment for intensive growth of Sweet Corn. In addition, among the CRF 3, 4 and 5g/plant treatment plots, CRF 5g/plant treatment showed the highest result in the average fresh weight, total ear weight, width, length and diameter.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/58479 /en/trial_results/58479#comment Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:40:35 +0900 /en/trial_results/58316 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:40px;">Chinese Kale yield increased by application of Nousbo Controlled Release Fertilizer in Thailand. Research summary</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:28px;">(Summary of the study of Nousbo CRF 26-5-12 effect on Chinese Kale growth and yield performances in Thailand)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">With the increasing public concern about human health, environmental protection and sustainability of natural resources, it is essential to develop environmentally friendly fertilizers. CRFs are a good alternative to soluble fertilizer in order to increase nitrogen usage efficiency and minimize nutrient losses in the field environment. Therefore, CRF 26-5-12 was evaluated for its efficacy as one-time application product for complete nutrient supply for Chinese Kale from August to January, 2018-2019 in two locations in Thailand: King Mongut&rsquo;s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL) field in Bangkok, which is considered as field with low soil fertility, and Chiang Mai University field in Chiang Mai Province, which is considered as field with common soil fertility.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="kale-farm.jpg" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/377368a9e4973a8b006ecb77aa952271.jpg" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;">(Kale farm)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo CRF 26-5-12 is a fertilizer in the form of granules coated with polymer material that can control the rate, pattern and duration of plant nutrient release. For both two locations, the CRF efficiency was evaluated at the rate of 2, 3 and 4 g/plant as a single base fertilizer which is equal to 320 kg/ha, 480 kg/ha and 640 kg/ha respectively, and compared with conventional fertilizer at the rate of 320 kg/ha applied 3 times as top dressing, which equals to 960 kg/ha in total. Data for growth and development was recorded by assessment of the leaf length, leaf weight and yield at harvest. SPAD (soil plant analysis development) chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR) was also recorded. Results are summarized in the following table.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">Yield and growth parameters of Chinese Kale affected by various kinds of CRF fertilizers at KMITL and Chiang Mai experimental fields</span></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody> <tr> <th rowspan="2" width="10%"><span style="font-size:16px;">Treatment</span></th> <th rowspan="2" width="10%"><span style="font-size:16px;">Rate of<br /> Application</span></th> <th rowspan="2" width="10%"><span style="font-size:16px;">Rate per<br /> hectare</span></th> <th colspan="2"><span style="font-size:16px;">Total fresh weight </span><span style="font-size:14px;">(g/plant)</span></th> <th colspan="2"><span style="font-size:16px;">Leaf weight </span><span style="font-size:14px;">(g/plant)</span></th> <th colspan="2"><span style="font-size:16px;">Leaf length </span><span style="font-size:14px;">(cm/plant)</span></th> <th colspan="2"><span style="font-size:16px;">SCMR</span> <span style="font-size:14px;">(SPAD<br /> chlorophyll<br /> meter reading)</span></th> </tr> <tr> <th width="10%"><span style="font-size:16px;">KMITL</span></th> <th width="10%"><span style="font-size:16px;">Chiang Mai</span></th> <th width="9%"><span style="font-size:16px;">KMITL</span></th> <th width="10%"><span style="font-size:16px;">Chiang Mai</span></th> <th width="10%"><span style="font-size:16px;">KMITL</span></th> <th width="10%"><span style="font-size:16px;">Chiang Mai</span></th> <th width="11%"><span style="font-size:16px;">KMITL</span></th> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">T1-</span><br /> <span style="font-size:16px;">No fertilizer</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">none</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">none</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">0.98</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">13.30</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">0.73</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">10.55</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">2.56</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">8.13</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">23.15</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">T2-</span><br /> <span style="font-size:16px;">100%<br /> conventional<br /> fertilizer</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:16px;">1st Fertilizer<br /> +<br /> 2nd Fertilizer<br /> +<br /> 3rd Fertilizer</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:16px;">320kg<br /> +<br /> 320kg<br /> +<br /> 320kg<br /> =</span><br /> <span style="font-size:16px;">total 960kg</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">27.57</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">48.65</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">17.91</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">38.10</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">5.98</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">9.90</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">41.23</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">T3-</span><br /> <span style="font-size:16px;">CRF alone</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">2g/plant</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">320kg</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">28.51</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">63.90</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">17.88</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">51.40</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">6.58</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">10.51</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">48.25</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">T4-</span><br /> <span style="font-size:16px;">CRF alone</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">3g/plant</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">480kg</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">38.18</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">79.15</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">26.43</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">62.35</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">7.44</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">12.01</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">49.40</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">T5-</span><br /> <span style="font-size:16px;">CRF alone</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">4g/plant</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">640kg</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">40.24</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">89.50</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">34.41</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">67.50</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">8.04</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">11.63</span></td> <td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">51.68</span></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">Analysis of growth parameters of Chinese kale showed that fresh weight at harvesting state was higher in all CRFs treated plots compared with conventional fertilizer-treated plots. Total fresh weight values in KMITL were 28.51, 38.18 and 40.24 g/plant for 2, 3 and 4 g/plant CRF treatments, respectively, while the total fresh weight of Chinese kale plants treated with conventional fertilizer was only 27.57 g/plant. The result from Chiang Mai field experiment revealed that the enhanced fresh weight of Chinese kale was recorded for CRF 2, 3 and 4 g/plant treatments. It was also observed, that a significantly higher chlorophyll index can be obtained in all CRF fertilizer treated plots. Similar trends of treatment effects on other Chinese kale yield parameters such as leaf weight and leaf length were recorded as well.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="kale.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/3edbc204f9c661397c486b1d33b7c2be.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">(No fertilizer)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(Conventional fertilizer)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(CRF 2g/plant)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (CRF 3g/plant)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (CRF 4g/plant)</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">[ Yield quality of Chinese kale affected by various kinds of fertilizers ]</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px;">The experiment results indicated that single basal application of CRF obviously contributed to a greater supply of soil available nutrient, thus creating a suitable nutritional environment for vigorous growth of Chinese kale, even though all CRF rates used in this experiment contained available N-P-K lower than conventional fertilizer. In addition, among the CRF 2, 3 and 4 g/plant treatments, CRF 4 g/plant treatment showed the best effect on the average fresh weigh of Chinese kale.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Hi-Cote_20kg.png" src="/en/files/attach/images/58290/316/058/915b3e0764630954f6b0c74fa930b792.png" /></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/controlled_release_fertilizer/49814" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size:20px;">View related products &gt;&gt;</span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:42px;">Contact now</span></strong></a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Nousbo is listening to your valuable opinions through the customer inquiry page.<br /> If you leave any inquiries, we will answer you with sincerity.</span></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><a href="/en/contact_us"><strong><span style="font-size:60px;"><i class="xi-border-color"></i></span></strong></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Trial Results (주)누보 /en/trial_results/58316 /en/trial_results/58316#comment Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:45:20 +0900